← BACK TO ARCHIVE

FEEDBACK

R:EL is an Arte Útil project, art that operates as civic infrastructure. Your feedback helps shape the archive and its function. Every response is anonymous. Every field is optional. Take what resonates, leave what doesn't.

This form does not collect your name, email, or any identifying information. Your responses are used solely to understand how R:EL is experienced and how it can better serve the communities it was built for. Nothing here is sold, shared, or used for any purpose other than improving this project.

What did you contribute to R:EL, and why?

When you named what you felt, did the act of naming it change anything for you?

R:EL asks people to share economic and emotional experiences anonymously into a public archive. Does that feel like an act of trust, resistance, solidarity, or something else?

R:EL AI suggests emotional tags based on what you describe. Did the language it offered feel different from how you normally talk about your feelings?

Yes, it named something I don't usually have words for Somewhat No, it felt similar to how I already think about it I didn't use R:EL AI

R:EL redefines "open source." Participation, archive, vocabulary, and outcomes are open; infrastructure is protected because what people share is intimate and given in trust. Does that distinction matter?

Who do you think this project is for?

Does R:EL feel like art, like infrastructure, like both, or like something else entirely?

Was there anything about the experience that felt extractive, unclear, or uncomfortable?

If R:EL existed permanently, maintained by a dedicated archivist, used by mutual aid organizations, food policy councils, and community researchers, would you contribute to it regularly?

Yes Probably I'm not sure No

Is there anything else you want to share about R:EL?